Victorious Secret: Lingerie for Overcomers
Ms. Wisteria, who holds a degree in early Christian fabric and drapery design from Emory University’s Candler School of Theology, worked as a model during her student days, and she came to a conclusion: Christian women needed a lingerie line that would let them look sexy but still retain that sense of modesty required for bedtime prayers and morning quiet time.
There’s a widespread misconception, she said, that Christians fear pleasure, especially sexual pleasure, and see it as degrading, corrupting and tainted.
“That’s a dirty, rotten LIE,” she yelled, stamping her foot on the marble floor.
“But it’s always so hard for a couple to transition from kneeling together in awe before the gates of heaven — praying for famine victims in Darfur, for instance, or the political situation in East Timor–and then jumping into the sack for a session of hot carnal pleasure. I wanted to help bridge that gap. That was my sacred mission.”
The result was her first popular cutting-edge design– the breakaway flannel granny gown.
If I wouldn’t take so much heat out of the fundamentalist Evangelical right (And reverends thereof), there’s a twisted part of me that would want to not bill this as the parody it is — and see how many would take it seriously.
But, having been drawn and quartered for not condemning a client who bought his wife sweaters from Victoria’s Secret, for linking to a site which sells foam wedges to support couples for love making (Especially disabled couples), for suggesting a Pyrex toy could be used to treat vaginal spasms, for suggesting that God created our ability to have fantasy and for having the nerve to suggest a sexual teaching guide (with [GASP] pencil diagrams) was not leading a couple into pornography, I must refrain — and wonder how much of the article really is parody; or if it’s history…






June 17th, 2009 at 6:51 am
Gee wonder what this same person would have thought of sex ed classes…..and the video we watched in high school that showed an actual birth…
June 18th, 2009 at 3:26 am
Hi Kathy,
It’s hardly just one guy…
For example: Focus on the Family just today managed to find it in their hearts to allow female employees to no longer wear skirts to work. (I gotta hand it to them for at least joining 1985, but, — thank God — without the spandex…)
There is a large subset of Evangelicalism that is terrified of sexuality in EVERY form and seeks to manage it even to the level of aggressive dress codes.
School sex ed is still considered by most of them to be a front for planned parenthood and an attempt to GET teens pregnant.
It’s like a parallel universe…
Cal
June 18th, 2009 at 7:23 am
Kinda like how people were saying, essentially, that the HPV vaccine for young girls = a LICENCE for them to have sex.
…
A few years? Why does it take a few years to change a dress code? One email oughta do it….
And then there’s Bible School dress codes – don’t even get me started….
June 18th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
Hi Kathy,
None of it is about the children they claim to protect or the goodness they claim to bring. It’s all about the maintenance of an image.
If you look at Sarah Palin, it doesn’t take a genius to see that there is actually some sort of a twisted pride there there surrounding the abject miss-parenting of her little kids. (Who are basically just starving for the love their completely weird family obviously didn’t have):
They drowned their kids in judgment, made them props in some sort of religious/political/narcissistic drama, didn’t teach their kids about birth control (Soundly condemned such actually) and didn’t market abortion an option (The only thing they did right).
So, their little girl (almost inevitably) manages to have a child out of wedlock with a guy who seriously was raised to be the emotional/verbal village idiot (This is how desperate their poor little girl was) and Palin can then flaunt it as some sort of badge of how pro-life and righteous she is.
The irony is that the Republican party is so self absorbed and blind that they will likely end up being led by this idiot.
You and I stand back and look at the years it takes to change any of this sort of thing and shake our heads — but in that parallel universe, it makes perfect sense because all of the agents invested in the maintenance of that image have to find a new way to spin their story about the righteousness formerly evidenced by the enforced behaviors…
God forbid that Palin should stand up and say:
If she did, how could she ever be holier then Thou?
Cal